Andrick wrote:
Aw, shove over, Uncle. I didn't ask for the universal definition but the norms, and platitudes don't count.
Umm,...I think Uncle made a good point....
The only reason WE, as humans, have "norms" is because we are able to create a current normalized spectrum based on the specific aspects of the human form that the public at large finds "pretty".
To do so in the SLOP Universe would be almost impossible without being able to define that specific normalized spectrum of "pretty" traits
for each species (meaning what's currently considered pretty about that species specifically, as judged by their own kind), and
by each species (meaning, what does any particular species consider "pretty" for all other species besides their own).
Personally,..if I were one particular SLOP species representative,...I'm not sure I'd even
bother trying to learn what all the other species considered "pretty" among (and applied to) their own kind, nor would I want to waste my time convincing them (of other species) what they should consider to be beautiful when looking at my own kind. And, in fact, I'm sure they'd have their own opinions (flavored by their own species' standards) of what makes "my" kind beautiful that might be TOTALLY different from my species' own current standards at any given time.
And as you can imagine, each species would no doubt have VERY different ideas about what makes something "pretty" by their own species' standards....among their own kind... And this would no doubt apply across MANY traits,..including smell and touch....
Uncle's approach may be the best way to go... Unless, in asking for "norms" Andrick, you are willing to go the distance not only of getting the "norms as they apply to all species in SLOP, but ALSO getting the norms in each species' minds as they apply to their opinion of all OTHER species besides themselves (unless you believe they would all agree on what each individual species determined were the traits that they, themselves, should be judged by...)...
Jadúgara ^_^